Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Brown

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry M. Ramey, Judge. (1) If Tyler signed his name ón the back of the note after its execution, he was not a co-maker, but a guarantor. Corbyn v. Brokmeyer, 84 Mo. App. 649; Adams v. Huggins, 73 Mo. App. 143; Burnham v. Gosnell, 47 Mo. App. 637; Ilagg v. Linnenfelser, 59 Mo. 336. (2) The undertaking of a guarantor is his own separate and independent contract, distinct from that of the principal debtor.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. Henry M. Ramey, Judge. (1) If Tyler signed his name ón the back of the note after its execution, he was not a co-maker, but a guarantor. Corbyn v. Brokmeyer, 84 Mo. App. 649; Adams v. Huggins, 73 Mo. App. 143; Burnham v. Gosnell, 47 Mo. App. 637; Ilagg v. Linnenfelser, 59 Mo. 336. (2) The undertaking of a guarantor is his own separate and independent contract, distinct from that of the principal debtor. Parmalee v. Williams, 71 Mo. 410; Reagan v. Williams, 88 Mo. App. 584; Maddox v. Duncan, 143 Mb. 621; Corbyn v. Brokmeyer, 84 Mo. App. 649. (3) It is…

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

On December 28, 1889, George M. Brown executed a non-negotiable note for $600 to George W. Yowler. On the back of the note the name, J. F. Tyler, is indorsed. Both Brown, the payor, and Yowler, the payee, died and afterwards plaintiffs became the owner of the note after its maturity. Plaintiffs presented it for allowance to the probate court where it was allowed. On appeal to the circuit court the plaintiffs again prevailed. The defense is the statute of limitations. The plaintiffs seek to avoid the statute by payments made by said Tyler and indorsed on the note. A question arose whether…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Meier v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Carpenter v. . SouleNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Ring v. JamisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Lasseter v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. Huse v. AmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darks v. Scudder-Gale Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Snider v. McAteeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Howard v. HardyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Lowenstein v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Snider v. McAteeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API