Angell v. Hester
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Clair Circuit Court. Stanton vs. Ryan, 41 Mo. 510 ; State ex rel. Towns!) end, Adm’r, vs. Meagher, 44 Mo. 356 ; Johnson vs. Quarles, 46 Mo. 423 ; Looker vs. Davis, 47 Mo. 140 ; Byrne vs. McDonald, 1 Allen, 295 ; Hubbard vs. Chapin, 2 Allen, 328 ; Granger vs. Bassett, 98 Mass. 458 ; Manuf. Bank vs. Schofield, 39 Yt. 590.
1Opinion of the CourtHenry, Judge
This was an action by plaintiff against defendant on a promissory note executed by defendant, and payable to one E. S Tyler, for the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars, and by said Tyler assigned to plaintiff.
The answer admitted the execution of the note and the assign'ment to plaintiffs, but alleges that before the assignment of the note to plaintiff, he made a payment thereon to Tyler of one hundred and fifty dollars.
At the March adjourned term of said court held in May, 1874, there was a trial of said cause by the court without a jury, both parties consenting, and the finding of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Granger v. BassettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Looker v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Manufacturers' Bank v. ScofieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lieber v. LieberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Meier v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- Ring v. JamisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Curd v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Darks v. Scudder-Gale Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.