Wildin v. City of Hutchinson
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
The fundamental questions in this appeal are whether in an action against the defendant city to recover for injuries to property as alleged in their petition the plaintiffs were required by G. S. 1949, 12-105 to file statement of their claim with the city, and if so whether the statement they did file met statutory requirements. An opinion is this day being filed in Howell v. City of Hutchinson (post 722) and reference is here made to portions thereof applicable to the situation here considered.
In April, 1943, plaintiffs commenced an action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Henry v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Dechant ex rel. Dechant v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Cook v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Hibbs v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- Campbell v. Wichita Union Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tucking v. BOARD OF JEFFERSON COUNTY COMM'RS.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- Watkins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Cornett v. City of NeodeshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Workman v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- McGinnis v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.