Cornett v. City of Neodesha
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, C. J.:
This is an action for damages instituted by the plaintiff, Mrs. Gladys Cornett, for injuries sustained from a fall on an alleged defective sidewalk located in the city of Neodesha.
The facts necessary to an orderly disposition of this appeal are as follows.
Plaintiff commenced this lawsuit by filing a petition containing two causes of action. Highly summarized, since its contents are not involved in this appeal, her first cause of action alleged the defect in the sidewalk complained of and that said defect caused her to fall; alleged with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dechant ex rel. Dechant v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Cook v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Avery v. City of LyonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Hibbs v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
- McHenry v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hunter v. North Mason School Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
- Ernest v. FalerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- McGuire v. SifersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Ruby Lupton, Administrator of the Estate of Lois Elaine Laptad, Deceased, and Cross-Appellee v. Peter Torbey, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Workman v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.