Rich v. Starbuck
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Wayne Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for two reasons:
1. Because the appellant has failed to serve a notice of the appeal on his co-party below, and file proof thereof with the clerk of this court, as required by section 551, 2 G. & H.
*311Daniel C. Rich was a co-party with the appéllant in the court below, and did not join in the appeal. Notice was given to him by a notice issued by the clerk of this court, at the written request of the appellant, which was served in the same manner as a summons in other cases. The official return of the officer serving it was filed with the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nelson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Glidewell v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Rickart v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Free v. HaworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Huntington v. DrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Harper v. StumpffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Atkinson v. DisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Roach v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Mobile Improvement & Building Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Glassburn v. DeerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.