Legal Opinion

Rich v. Starbuck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Wayne Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, for two reasons:

1. Because the appellant has failed to serve a notice of the appeal on his co-party below, and file proof thereof with the clerk of this court, as required by section 551, 2 G. & H.

*311Daniel C. Rich was a co-party with the appéllant in the court below, and did not join in the appeal. Notice was given to him by a notice issued by the clerk of this court, at the written request of the appellant, which was served in the same manner as a summons in other cases. The official return of the officer serving it was filed with the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Glidewell v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Rickart v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Free v. HaworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Huntington v. DrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harper v. StumpffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Atkinson v. DisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Roach v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Mobile Improvement & Building Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Glassburn v. DeerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API