Legal Opinion
Union MacHinery & Supply Co. v. Taylor-Morrison Logging Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1927No. 20312. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff supply company seeks recovery from the defendants, logging company, J. B. Wood and the executor of the estate of J. L. Kahaley, upon two promissory notes, one of which reads, as follows:
“$217.14 Seattle, Washington, June 3, 1924.
“Two months after date, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of the Union Machinery & Supply Company, a corporation of the state of Washington with its license fees paid (and licensed to do business in the Province of British Columbia as the Union Machinery & Supply Company, Limited), the sum of Two hundred seventeen and 14/100 Dollars, with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tucker Manufacturing Co. v. FairbanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Jump v. SparlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Liebscher v. KrausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Way v. Lyric Theater Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Farmers State Bank of Newport v. LamonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Hansen v. LindellWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Moore v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Losh Family, LLC v. KertsmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Robert D. Maland and Bonnie J. Maland v. Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company of Fort Worth, Texas, a Corporation, and Patricia RoystonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.