Legal Opinion

Liebscher v. Kraus

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1889PublishedCited by 34 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOrton, J.

This action was brought on the following promissory note:

“ $637.40. . Milwaukee, January 1st, 1887.
“Ninety days after date we promise to pay to Leo Lieb-scher, or order, the sum of. six hundred and thirty-seven dollars and forty cents, value received.
“ San Pedro Mining and Milling CoMpany.
“ F. Kraus, President.”

The plaintiff demands judgment on this note against both the corporation and Frederick Kraus, as joint makers. The defendant Kraus answered that he signed the note for the said San Pedro Mining & Milling Company, as its president, and not otherwise, and that his signature was placed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. MarshallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Falk v. MoebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Scanlan v. KeithIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Latham v. Houston Flour MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ballston Spa Bank v. Marine BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Little v. People's BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Germania National Bank of Milwaukee v. MarinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Briel v. Exchange Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Belmont Dairy Co. v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  5. Elofrson v. LindsayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API