Legal Opinion
Moore v. Webster
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1937No. 26677. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover on eight promissory notes, seven of' which were, except as to maturity dates, identical in terms and figures, as follows:
“No. 5 Bremerton, Washington, August 12, 1931
“Five months after date we promise to pay to the Lee Tire & Rubber Company of N. Y., Inc. at the ...............................................................Seventy-five and 00/100 dollars ($75.00) with 6 per cent interest per annum from date till paid, value received. If this note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, the makers and endorsers hereof agree to pay the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Farmers State Bank of Newport v. LamonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Toon v. McCawWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Shuey v. AdairWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Union MacHinery & Supply Co. v. Taylor-Morrison Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Bostwick Banking Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Western MacHinery Company, a Corporation v. Northwestern Improvement Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. WicklundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Norman v. BelingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959