Legal Opinion

Sam Bialac, and Rental Development Corporation of America, an Arizona Corporation, Additional Party v. Harsh Building Co., an Oregon Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1972No. 71-2543PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is reversed. We conclude that we must find there was a lack of diversity of citizenship. Of course, it is tragic when we come up with such a result after the case has gone through a long trial.

Here, the parties stipulated at the outset that one of the defendants, Harsh Building Corporation, has its principal place of business in Oregon. Later the evidence showed that really the only business activity of Harsh Building Corporation is owning and operating the Phoenix apartment complex which is the subject of this suit. Two of the plaintiffs are citizens of Arizona. Thus, we find at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charles Resnik v. La Paz Guest RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Lurie Company v. Loew's San Francisco Hotel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1970

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Industrial Tectonics, Inc. v. Aero Alloy, a California Corporation Die Cast Products, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Metal Products GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. James C. Kanzelberger and Contemporary, Inc., Cross v. Warren F. Kanzelberger and Geraldine G. Kanzelberger, Cross-Appellees, and William J. DeauCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Robbin Weaver v. Hollywood Casino-Aurora, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Columbia Power Trades Council v. United States Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (Bpa), and Sterling Munro, as Bpa AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API