Poly-America, L.P. v. Gse Lining Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
GSE Lining Technology, Inc. (“GSE”) appeals from the post-trial decision of the district court denying its motion for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) that two of Poly-America, L.P.’s (“Poly-America’s”) patents relating to landfill liner-technology were invalid. Poly-America, L.P. v. GSE Lining Tech., Inc., No. 3:00-CV-1457-D, 2003 WL 21946842 (N.D.Tex. Aug. 13, 2003) (“Post-Trial Order"). GSE also appeals from the denial of its motion for a new trial on damages. Id. Because we agree with the district court’s claim construction with respect to Poly-America’s patents…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. coolsavings.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Deere & Co. v. Bush Hog, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Mars, Inc. v. Coin Acceptors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Depuy Spine, Inc. (Formerly Known as Depuy Acromed, Inc.) v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. (Formerly Known as Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- On Demand MacHine Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. Ingram Industries, Inc. And Lightning Source, Inc., and amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.