Legal Opinion
Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. coolsavings.com, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 8, 2002No. 01-1324PublishedCited by 350 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held that Coolsav-ings.com, Inc. (Coolsavings) did not infringe, either literally or by equivalents, the claims of Catalina Marketing International, Inc.’s (Catalina’s) U.S. Patent No. 4,674,041 (the '041 patent). Catalina Mktg. Int’l, Inc. v. Coolsavings.com, Inc., No. 00C 2447, slip op. at 6-7, 2001 WL 300235 (N.D.Ill. Mar.28, 2001). In the alternative, the district court applied prosecution history estoppel to bar Catalina from seeking equivalents on the location of the claimed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by350 opinions
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Seachange International, Inc. v. C-Cor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bicon, Inc v. The Straumann CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Symantec Corp. v. Computer Associates International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.