Legal Opinion

Magone v. Rosenstein

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 1892No. 145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The defendant in error imported into the port of New York from Sweden -301 cases of matches known as parlor matches, and ten cases of matches known as safety matches.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The defendant in error imported into the port of New York from Sweden -301 cases of matches known as parlor matches, and ten cases of matches known as safety matches. The boxes contained about seventy matches each, and were made of very thin pieces of soft wood covered with paper, and so constructed that the receptacle containing the matches fitted snugly into the cover like a drawer and could be slid out of the cover at either end for the purpose of withdrawing the contents. The defendant, as collector,…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice :

The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Oberteuffer v. Robertson, 116 U. S. 499.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oberteuffer v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HohnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
  3. Julliard Fancy Foods Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. United States v. SassiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. United States v. MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API