Oberteuffer v. Robertson
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. This was an action brought to recover back duties alleged to have been illegally exacted. The facts which make the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford
This is an action brought in a State'Court in New York, by Reece M. Oberteuffor, Henry Abegg and Henry H. Daenilcer, composing the mercantile firm of Oberteuffer, Abegg & Daen■iker, against William H. Robertson. Collector of the port of New York, to recover $140.80 as an excess of duties, paid on ■coverings and putting up charges on hosiery and gloves, on which ad valorem duties were imposed by law. It was removed into the Circuit Court of the United States by the defendant. At the trial the jury rendered a verdict for the defendant, by direction of the court, and there was a judgment for…
2Cited by36 opinions
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Robertson v. Frank Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Wolff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.