Legal Opinion

United States v. Mathews

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 1, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District: of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge.

In the year 1891, the firm of Mathews, Blum & Vaughan imported into the port of New York sundry invoices of articles which they styled coverings or cases containing needles. These cases were made either of silk or of leather or of paper, but were not: like the well-known folded paper covers in which needles a,re wrapped. The collector assessed the cases as entire articles, according to their component material of chief value, either as manufactures of paper, under paragraph 425, or manufactures of leather, under paragraph 461, or manufactures of silk, under paragraph…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LeggettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
  2. Magone v. RosensteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. DieckerhoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  2. United States v. Strauss Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API