Legal Opinion
Bird v. Borough of Moosic
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00337Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HEATHER BIRD, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-cv-00337 v. (SAPORITO, M.J.) BOROUGH OF MOOSIC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM This is a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff, Heather Bird, is a part-time police officer for one of the two named defendants, the Borough of Moosic. Bird was injured on the job and applied for temporary disability benefits under the Pennsylvania Heart and Lung Act, 53 P.S. § 637. On September 10, 2019, the second of two named defendants, James Segilia, mayor of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.