Legal Opinion

Abad v. Cozza

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1996No. 62987-1PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

— The Spokane County District Court adopted a local rule and a form requiring persons seeking a deferred prosecution to waive, upon any subsequent revocation of the deferred prosecution, the rights to a jury, to call and question witnesses, and to testify in the postrevocation trial. The Court of Appeals held that the local rule and form were beyond the authority of the district court under the pertinent portion of the deferred prosecution statute, RCW 10.05.020. We hold that the local rule and form were consistent with the statutory requirements of RCW 10.05.020 and reverse the Court of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Auburn v. BrookeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. PavelichWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Matter of JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Abad v. CozzaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Michel v. City of RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API