Legal Opinion
Bourland v. Southard
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 18, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMehakky, J.
This suit was begun by property owners in Paving District No. 11 of the city of Fort Smith against the Board of Improvement and Henry C. Lane, as collector of the district. The appellees who brought this suit are owners of real property in the district, and .brought the suit for themselves and others similarly situated.
The appellants, who were defendants below, are Fag*an Bourland, mayor; Earl Henderson, commissioner No. 1, and W. H. Vaughan, commissioner No. 2, of the city of Ft. Smith, who constitute the board of improvement for said district.
The district was organized to pave certain…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sudberry v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- McAdams v. HenleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Paving District No. 5 v. FernandezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Bauer v. North Arkansas Highway Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. DermottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Benton v. NowlinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Bourland v. ColemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Green v. Wulff Drainage District No. 4Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Bray v. Department of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.