Legal Opinion

Bauer v. North Arkansas Highway Improvement District No. 1

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 16, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after' stating the facts). The main reliance of the defendants for a reversal of the judgment is that they were released from liability on the bond by reason of a special act of the Legislature. The Legislature of 1917 passed an act creating North Arkansas Highway Improvement District No. 1. Acts of Arkansas, 1917, vol. 2, p. 1149.

Section ■ 22 of the act provides that the commissioners shall' select such, solvent. hanks as depositories for the funds .of the district as they may deem for the best interest thereof. The. section further provides that said depositories shall be required…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McSurely v. McGrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Russell v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  4. Miller v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Miller v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bolivar Twp. Bd. of Fin. of Benton Co. v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Laman v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Bourland v. SouthardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  5. Schenebeck v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API