Bray v. Department of State
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentLevin, J.
This cause concerns a governmental exaction that is difficult to label. The circuit court and the Court of Appeals characterized the exaction as a 'Tícense fee”1 and as an *166"insurance premium” respectively,2 holding in appellees’ favor under both labels. Today, the majority advises appellees that they may not recover because the "uninsured motorist fee is more in the nature of a tax than either a license fee or an insurance premium”.3 Persuaded that appellees did not have an insurance contract with the state and that the $45 exaction could not have been levied validly as either a regulatory…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kent v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.