Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Dermott

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 22, 1934No. Nos. 4-3582, 4-3581PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

In the case first styled, the appellants, who allege that they are owners of real estate in the city of Dermott, brought suit against the mayor and recorder and members of the city council of Dermott, and against A. Prothro, as the only surviving member of the Board of Waterworks Improvement District No. 1 and of Light District No. 1 of the city of Dermott, to enjoin the performance of a contract between the city of Dermott and the Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works in Washington, D. C.

On the same day the complaint was filed, the appellants filed an amendment thereto, and to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Polk County v. Mena Star Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Cumnock v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Bourland v. SouthardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maddox v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Williams v. Harris, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. City of Harrison v. BraswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Mathers v. Moss, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. City of Harrison v. BraswellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API