Legal Opinion

Gospodar v. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1946PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

Appellant’s first contention is' that there is no evidence of negligence on the part of Clark county snowplow operators. This requires an examination of the facts.

Irene Gospodar, Mary Hebert, and Joyce Borchek were employed in the village of Thorp, and on April 4, 1945, after their work ended at 5 o’clock in the afternoon, they entered the car of the plaintiff Joyce Borchek and started for their homes in Stanley. They were traveling west on the north side of Highway 29, and when they were about three and one-half miles east of Stanley they met a snowplow traveling east, removing snow from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hansberry v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Anderson v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Booth v. FrankensteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. DeKeyser v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gorton v. Hostak, Henzl & Bichler, S.C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Martell v. KlingmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Baldwin v. St. Peter's CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Jacobson v. Greyhound Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. York v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API