Legal Opinion

Martell v. Klingman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1960PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

1. Policy defense. Klingman applied to National Indemnity Company for collision and liability insurance on March 15, 1958. He signed an application form in which the insurance agent wrote the information in the spaces provided. One of the spaces in the form was designated : “Describe all driving violations or convictions below” and in that space, the agent wrote “None.” In fact, in May, 1952, Klingman had been fined $8.95 for speeding, apparently in violation of a city ordinance, and in August, 1952, had been fined $13 for reckless driving in violation of a county ordinance. The agent did not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kuehn v. KuehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. KroeningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Mitchell Realty Co. v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Baldwin v. St. Peter's CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Wadzinski v. Cities Service Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. John Klingman v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  3. Jacobs v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. SeibelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Schumacher v. KlabundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API