Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. Elder

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1932No. Civil No. 3122PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Mrs. Martha M. Elder, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against Mrs. S. Ainsworth, hereinafter called defendant, seeking to enjoin defendant against constructing or maintaining a certain so-called “duplex” building, designed for and suitable for use as a residence for two families, on lot 3 of block 16, plat B, F. Q. Story addition to the city of Phoenix. A permanent injunction was issued, which reads as follows:

“It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant, her agents, servants, employees, grantees, and assigns be forever enjoined from constructing that certain ‘duplex’ on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. UlrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Harris v. RorabackMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Green v. GernerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Murphey v. GrayArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Powell v. WashburnArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Gerstell Et Ux. v. KnightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API