Powell v. Washburn
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Justice.
¶ 1 This ease requires us to interpret real property restrictive covenants. One approach has been to construe such covenants narrowly, to favor the free use of land. We today adopt the approach of the Restatement (Third) of Property: Servitudes (“Restatement”) and hold that restrictive covenants should be interpreted to give effect to the intention of the parties as determined from the language of the document in its entirety and the purpose for which the covenants were created.
I
A
¶ 2 In November 1988, Thomas Washburn, President of K.R.C. Corporation, recorded the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- First American Title Insurance v. Action Acquisitions, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Tierra Ranchos Homeowners Ass'n v. KitchukovCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- William Roubos v. Hon. Leslie miller/tucsonArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Agua Fria Save the Open Space Ass'n v. RoweNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass'n v. OrlandiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.