In re Interrogatories of the Governor
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
Certain interrogatories have been propounded to this court by the Governor, as follows:
1. Does an act of the General Assembly which contains the emergency clause, but does not contain the so-called safety clause, go into effect immediately upon the passage and approval thereof?
2. In the absence of the so-called safety clause, is an act of the General Assembly subject to the referendum, notwithstanding it contains the emergency declaration that the same shall take effect from and after its passage and approval?
3. When does an act of the General Assembly passed .with the emergency clause, but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arkansas Tax Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- State ex rel. Richards v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Van Kleeck v. RamerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- State ex rel. Lavin v. BaconSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Sears v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hutchens v. JacksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- State National Bank v. Board of CouncilmenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- People v. BostonColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re Senate Resolution No. 2Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Todd v. TierneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933