Legal Opinion

State National Bank v. Board of Councilmen

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 27, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

Whether the appellant is subject to a sixty -cent tax rate or a $2.35 tax rate by appellee depends on whether or not chapter 117 of the Acts of 1924 took effect on June 18th or July 18th of that year, and this question in turn depends on the interpretation to be put on the referendum clause of section 171 of the state Constitution as amended in 1915. So far as pertinent that section reads as follows:

“Any law passed or enacted by the General Assembly pursuant to the provisions of or under this *544amendment or amended section of the Constitution,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Town of South Ottawa v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Arkansas Tax Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Richards v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Wilkes County v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. State ex rel. Kemper v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Powell County v. Clay City Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. City of Williamsburg v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  3. Ross, Sheriff v. First Nat. Bank of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Todd v. TierneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API