Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Senate Resolution No. 2

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 12, 1934No. 13,433Published

1DissentJustice Butler

1. The bill in question was passed by the House and sent to the Senate, where it was passed on second read*122ing. The Senate resolution states that the hill probably ■will pass on third and final reading if the bill is deemed constitutional. The resolution contains the recital, customary on such occasions, that the Senate entertains doubts as to the constitutionality of the bill. The Senate wants to know whether or not, if the hill is enacted, the statute would be in conflict with certain specified pro-' visions of the Constitution; therefore, the test to be applied is the same as though the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API