Minneapolis Threshing MacHine Co. v. Humphrey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by the Minneapolis Threshing Machine Company against John Humphrey and J. J. Burke. From the judgment plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, upon three promissory notes executed by both defendants as principals to apply upon the purchase price of a threshing machine. The part of the separate answer of the defendant J. J. Burke that raises the only question involved in this proceeding, is, in substance, as follows: That on the 30th day of January, 1902, he desired to surrender to the plaintiff the threshing machine outfit upon which the mortgage had been given to secure the payment of the notes sued upon and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hammond v. HanninMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Ricker Nat. Bank v. StoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Long v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Grande v. ChavesTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Pratt v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. CargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Horton v. EarlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wrought Iron Range Co. v. LeachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.