Grande v. Chaves
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Bexar. There was no allusion to his power of attorney from the heirs, by Flores, either in his petition for letters or in the proceedings for sale, or in the deed.
1Opinion of the Court
Hemphill, Oh. J.
This is a suit to try the title to a lot in. San Antonio, brought by the same plaintiffs who appealed, against Herrera and Montes, in No. 529. (Supra.) The facts are the same in both cases, with this distinction, that the lot sold to Herrera was a portion of the community of gains, between Juan Antonio Padilla and his wife, whereas the lot in this suit and which was sold to the defendant Chaves, was of the separate property. In the suit against Herrera it was not necessary to decide on the validity of the grant of administration to Flores, so far as it embraced the estate of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Stephenson v. MarsalisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Ryan v. MaxeyTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Minneapolis Threshing MacHine Co. v. HumphreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Stafford v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Cicerello v. C. & O. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.