Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Durgis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1936No. Docket No. 50, Calendar No. 38,617PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

At about 1:30 a. m. on July 16, 1933, Orville McMann, accompanied by Zelma Shanks and plaintiff Mrs. Gladys Herbert, while returning from a dance, drove a roadster in a northerly direction towards Forrester, Michigan, on M-29, a gravel road, approximately 16 feet wide, skirting the shore of Lake Huron. About a mile south of Forrester, the road proceeds across a bridge 40 feet long and from 13 to 16 feet wide, the testimony being in conflict as to the exact width. A sign at the northerly approach to the bridge read, “narrow bridge, one way traffic.” As the roadster approached the bridge, a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mayo v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Curth v. New York Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Sima v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Close v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Bates v. KitchelMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Felgner v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Pinkerton v. Oak Park National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  4. Williams v. MatlinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
  5. Smith v. MusgroveMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API