Legal Opinion

Bates v. Kitchel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1911No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Branch; Chester, J., presiding. Case by Charles Bates against Horace Eitchel for false imprisonment. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

A judgment rendered for the defendant upon a former trial of this cause was reversed and a new trial granted. Bates v. Kitchel, 160 Mich. 403 (125 N. W. 684). There has been another trial, resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $750. The former opinion of this court states somewhat fully the genesis of this action. It is sufficient to say here that the plaintiff was a witness for the people in a certain criminal proceeding instituted against defendant, in which proceeding defendant was found guilty in justice’s court in the city of Coldwater and appealed to the circuit court.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mayo v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Maclean v. ScrippsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Fuller v. BowkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Henry C. Hart Manufacturing Co. v. Mann's Boudoir Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Pierson v. Illinois Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AllenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Brooks v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Herbert v. DurgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Close v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Fleischer v. BuccilliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API