Legal Opinion

Sima v. Wright

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 23, Calendar No. 37,807PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff had judgment for $7,000 in an action for negligent malpractice.

Defendant, a physician, gave plaintiff a diathermic treatment for pain in the back. The treatment was administered with an electrical machine, designed to produce deep heat through lead plates on the back and abdomen. Patients react differently to the treatment. Some are sensitive to heat and are easily burned. Others can stand more. Some complain of excessive heat when it is neither excessive nor dangerous. Others are stoical and may not complain when they should. The machine may be regulated at points ranging from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MulvaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. AllanMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bivens v. Detroit Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Bryant v. BiggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Herbert v. DurgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API