Legal Opinion

Gumpper v. Waterbury Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 22, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven county and tried to the court, Prentice, J., upon the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint; the court sustained the demurrer and rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Torrance, J,

The statute (Chap: 176 of the Public Acts of 1895) provides that “ no suit or action for damages on *425account of injury to, or death of, any person caused by negligence shall be maintained against any electric, cable, horse, or steam railroad company, unless written notice of a claim therefor, giving a general description of such injury and the time, place, and cause of its occurrence, as nearly as the same can be ascertained, shall have been given to the defendant company within four months after the neglect complained of.” The second section of the Act provides as follows: “…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chew Heong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Thames Manufacturing Co. v. LathropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829
  3. Smith v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Old Saybrook v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  2. Gallardo v. Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
  3. Apokaa Sugar Co. v. WilderHawaii Supreme Court · 1913
  4. National Mines Co. v. Sixth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada ex rel. County of HumboldtNevada Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Anderson-Tully Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API