Legal Opinion · Dissent

Apokaa Sugar Co. v. Wilder

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1913Published

Submission Upon Agreed Statement oe Eacts.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OP

PERRY, J.

Act '33 of the Laws of 1909, approved by the governor on March 22 of that year, provided, for the first time in the history of Hawaii, for the imposition of a special tax on incomes, ever since known as the conservation tax, to be 'used, three-fourths for the encouragement of immigration and one-fourth for the development, conservation., improvement and utilization of the natural resources of the Territory. The first and second sections directed that, in addition to the tax of two per cent. *578authorized by an earlier statute to be levied and collected upon incomes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Reynolds v. McArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Gumpper v. Waterbury Traction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  4. Keola v. Maui Auto Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API