Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Anderson-Tully Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 26, 1932No. 4-2599Published

1DissentMehaeey, J.

I do not agree with the majority in holding that act 281 of the Acts of 1931 is retroactive. The majority opinion holds that it was the intention to accomplish two things: first, to prevent the bringing of any new proceedings; second, to prevent the further prosecution of any proceedings which may have 'been pending at the effective date of the act, except under the terms of the act.

I think if the Legislature had intended that the act should be retroactive, it would have said so in so many words, and I think that the expression of the Legislature, “no proceedings shall hereafter be brought or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Smith v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  4. Ellis v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Gumpper v. Waterbury Traction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API