Legal Opinion

Oaks v. Oaks

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1892No. 14544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Fitzgerald, C.

Action to quiet plaintiff’s title to lot 4, block 105, in the city of San Luis Obispo.

The allegations of the complaint, which is in the usual form, but not verified, are denied by the answer, and defendant by her cross-complaint avers title to the lot in question in herself, and asks that her title thereto be quieted against plaintiff. Plaintiff answered the cross-complaint by a general denial, and afterwards, by leave of the court, filed a supplemental answer thereto, in which he sets up a declaration of homestead on said lot, made by him after the commencement of this action.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Schuler v. Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schuler-Knox Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Palen v. PalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. In re Estate of WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re Estate of Foster, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1909
  5. Wright v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API