Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

California Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1895No. 19,511Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, San Bernardino County; J. S. Noyes, Judge. Action by M. V. B. Wright against Margaret D. Wright, his wife, to have set aside a certain conveyance of gift from him to her, and to have the property covered thereby declared community property. There was judgment for defendant, from which plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

Plaintiff and defendant intermarried in the state of Ohio in 1859, and have ever since been, and now are, husband and wife. In 1873 they came to this state to live, and settled at Riverside. In November, 1878, Hattie L. Traver conveyed to defendant, by a quitclaim deed, twenty *120acres of land, situate in what is now the county of Riverside; and in May, 1883, she again conveyed to defendant the same land, by a bargain and sale deed. On the twenty-first day of May, 1885, plaintiff executed to defendant a deed of the same land, which, after referring to the last-named deed, recites…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. In re Estate of LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Read v. RahmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API