Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Winslow

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1898No. Sac. No. 357PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County setting apart a homestead to the widow of a deceased person. Matt. E. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

Robert B. Winslow and his wife Emily resided on a lot of land, which was community property, in the city of Sacramento; in the year 1890 the wife declared a homestead on the land in manner conformable to the statute. - On May 28., 1895, said married parties jointly executed a written instrument reciting that differences had arisen between them, that *93they desired to adjust the same and also their property rights without resort to the courts, and that they had agreed upon a division of their property, particularly described, in accordance with the provisions of such instrument; the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In re Estate of LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Oaks v. OaksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Withers v. PughCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bennett v. ForrestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Palen v. PalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Minier v. MarcouxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API