Legal Opinion

Palen v. Palen

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1938No. Civ. 6042PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Plaintiffs herein are husband and wife. Defendant is the divorced wife of Matthew A. Palen, one of the plaintiffs. Defendant held unsatisfied separate judgments against the plaintiffs. She attempted to' levy execution upon these several judgments upon certain real property standing in the name of Mary Agnes Palen, whereupon Mary Agnes Palen brought this action to quiet title to the property, claiming it to be her sole and separate property.

The trial court found the property in question was the separate property of plaintiff Mary Agnes Palen and that she had filed a homestead upon the property…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Dyment v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. In re Estate of WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. In re the Estate of FeasWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Keeline v. SealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kuchel v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gardner v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  3. Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Garten v. GartenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Arighi v. Rule & Sons, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API