Legal Opinion

Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 27, 2006No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0209PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Jean Cundiff appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company on her claim for a declaratory judgment that State Farm was not entitled to offset her workers’ compensation benefits against her underinsured motorist insurance (UIM) coverage for injuries she had sustained. Cundiffs UIM coverage contained a provision permitting State Farm to offset benefits Cundiff received from workers’ compensation from any UIM claim she made under her policy. The trial court ruled the offset provision was enforceable…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bothell v. Two Point Acres, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Castillo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dowling v. StapleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API