Medina v. Safe-Guard Products, International, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
Pedro Medina brought this unfair competition law or UCL (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) action based on the fact he had purchased a vehicle service contract, which is allegedly an insurance contract, 1 from a company not licensed to sell insurance in California. (See Ins. Code, § 700 [requiring licenses of insurers].) On a demurrer to the second amended complaint, the trial court reasoned that Medina did not meet the requirement set forth in Business and Professions Code section 17204, as amended by Proposition 64, that a UCL plaintiff have suffered “injury in fact and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Peterson v. Cellco PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Co. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Drum v. San Fernando Valley Bar Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.