Legal Opinion

In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of Rokahr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Alice L. Rokahr, an attorney-at-law licensed in South Dakota, has filed notice with this Court as required by SDCL 16-19-71 that she was subjected to professional disciplinary action' in another jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein and because this matter was referred to, and previously determined by the South Dakota Disciplinary Board, we decline to impose reciprocal discipline. We instead conduct our own independent review of the disciplinary record.

BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] Rokahr is a Yankton, South Dakota attorney admitted to the practice of law in both…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Smith v. Department of Registration & EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Appeal of SchrammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Petition of PierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bar v. DrungoleMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re Application of HenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Bates v. GilbertMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API