Legal Opinion
James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 7, 1994No. 92-2989PublishedCited by 251 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
James O’Conner originally brought this suit in Illinois state court. He sought damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by unsafe dosages of radiation. Shortly before trial, the action was removed to federal district court under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2014, 2210 (the “Amendments Act”). Defendants Commonwealth Edison Co. (“Commonwealth Edison”) and London Nuclear Services (“London Nuclear”) then moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the defendants’ motion. Mr. O’Conner appealed. We now affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Mr. O’Conner…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Lewis v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.