Childress v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUDSON, Judge.
The case arises from an attempt by plaintiff Jessie Bill Childress to reduce the amount of a workers’ compensation lien held by defendants Fluor Daniel, Inc. (Employer) and Broadspire (Carrier) on plaintiff’s recovery from a third-party tort-feasor. On 8 May 1997, plaintiff filed a Form 18B with the Commission alleging asbestosis and seeking benefits. Plaintiff later amended his Form 18B to include a claim for colon cancer. Defendants denied liability. On 16 April 2002, the Full Commission entered an opinion and award, awarding $20,000 each for three permanent injuries to three…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Ales v. T. A. Loving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Childress v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moody v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Dion v. BattenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Trustee Svcs. v. Rc Koonts & Sons MasonryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. CuffeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009