Bacigalupi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California; Maurice I. Dooling, Judge. John Bacigalupi was convicted of offenses, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was found guilty and sentenced under four counts of an indictment. The first two counts are similar. They charge that the defendant did violate the requirements of the Act of December 17, 1914 (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-*3686287q), as amended February 24, 1919 (40 Stat. 1130 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 6287g, 6287/]), in that, being a person required to register under the terms of said act, he did then and there unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly have in his possession, with intent to sell, a certain' derivative of coca leaves, to wit, eight bindles…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Seeberger v. SchweyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Pierriero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
- Wetzel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Casey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Stubbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Kuehn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Bethea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.