Legal Opinion

Richfield Hotel Management, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1994No. A063629PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, P. J.

respondent superior court in which real parties in interest are plaintiffs. Respondent court denied petitioner’s motion for change of venue and petitioner now seeks a writ of mandate directing the court to vacate its order of denial and grant the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 400; all subsequent statutory references to sections of an undesignated code are to the Code of Civil Procedure.) The issue in this proceeding is whether Government Code section 12965, subdivision (b), the venue statute of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), precludes a change of venue for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Harden v. Skinner & HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Pearson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Paesano v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. EpicentRx, Inc. v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  2. Rycz v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Sacramento Met Cable Television Commission v. Comcast Cable Communications Mgt.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Comm. v. Comcast Cable Comm. Mgt., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Scottsdale Insurance Company v. FinemanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API