Richfield Hotel Management, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
respondent superior court in which real parties in interest are plaintiffs. Respondent court denied petitioner’s motion for change of venue and petitioner now seeks a writ of mandate directing the court to vacate its order of denial and grant the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 400; all subsequent statutory references to sections of an undesignated code are to the Code of Civil Procedure.) The issue in this proceeding is whether Government Code section 12965, subdivision (b), the venue statute of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), precludes a change of venue for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Harden v. Skinner & HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Pearson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Paesano v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- EpicentRx, Inc. v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Rycz v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
- Sacramento Met Cable Television Commission v. Comcast Cable Communications Mgt.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Comm. v. Comcast Cable Comm. Mgt., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Scottsdale Insurance Company v. FinemanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021