Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1962No. Civ. 20242PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
Petitioner Queta Pearson, defendant and cross-complainant in an action for divorce seeks a writ of mandate compelling the respondent superior court to vacate and set aside its order denying petitioner’s motion for a change of venue of such divorce action from the City and County of San Francisco to the County of San Diego, and to grant such change of venue.
We set forth a chronology of the original proceedings: On March 28, 1961, real party in interest Bill Pearson (plaintiff and cross-defendant below) filed his complaint for divorce upon the grounds of extreme cruelty; on August 30, 1961,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Thomas v. Placerville Gold Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Willingham v. PecoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- San Jose Hospital v. EthertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Delgado v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Braunstein v. Superior Court of Monterey CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Richfield Hotel Management, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Union Trust Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.