Legal Opinion
Paesano v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 29, 1988No. C004428PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Petitioners are plaintiffs in a civil action pending in respondent superior court in which the real party in interest, County of Mono (county), is a defendant. That court denied petitioners’ motion for change of venue and they now seek a writ of mandate directing the court to vacate its order of denial and grant the motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 400; all subsequent statutory references to sections of an undesignated code are to the Code of Civil Procedure.) The issue in this proceeding is whether section 394, a mandatory removal provision, takes precedence over section 397,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Delgado v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- County of Riverside v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Skidmore v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Group v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Richfield Hotel Management, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- County of Orange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999