Department of Transportation v. Webster
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Where the issue before the trial court was whether increased traffic flow on a private road taken for public use was a compensable damage subject to determination by jury, it was proper for the trial court to conduct a section 108 hearing. Where the trial court determined that the area taken by DOT did not include a subsequent driveway permit and related effects of that permit, we affirm the trial court order excluding evidence of such driveway permit and effects at a subsequent trial on damages.
In 2007, the Department of Transportation (“DOT”) was involved in a highway…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Payne v. KinderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
- Cartin v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Schiphof v. SchiphofCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mills v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Adver. of Charlotte Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Dep't of Transp. v. BB & R, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015