Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Webster

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 2013No. COA12-1546PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the issue before the trial court was whether increased traffic flow on a private road taken for public use was a compensable damage subject to determination by jury, it was proper for the trial court to conduct a section 108 hearing. Where the trial court determined that the area taken by DOT did not include a subsequent driveway permit and related effects of that permit, we affirm the trial court order excluding evidence of such driveway permit and effects at a subsequent trial on damages.

In 2007, the Department of Transportation (“DOT”) was involved in a highway…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Payne v. KinderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cartin v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COM'N v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Schiphof v. SchiphofCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mills v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Dep't of Transp. v. Adams Outdoor Adver. of Charlotte Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Dep't of Transp. v. BB & R, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API