Legal Opinion

United States v. Farrad

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2003No. 02-5856PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This is a direct appeal from a criminal judgment and commitment order entered after a specific remand from this court for that purpose. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

On June 16, 1999, Malik First Bom Allah Farrad (“Farrad”) was indicted on twenty-two separate counts relating to the acquisition and distribution of crack cocaine. A jury found Farrad guilty of twenty-one of the charges and the district court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Harvey E. Page (99-5361) Thomas Andre Powers (99-5449) Keith Linton (99-5451) David Shawn Hill (99-5456)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Malik FarradCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API